offshoreWIND.biz
  • Fixed-Bottom
  • Floating Wind
  • Supply Chain
  • Contracts & Tenders
  • Grid Connection
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
offshoreWIND.biz logo

Your trusted source for global offshore wind news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fixed-Bottom
  • Floating Wind
  • Grid Connection
  • Power-to-X
  • Supply Chain
Network
  • Offshore Wind
  • Dredging Today
  • NavalToday
  • Offshore Energy
  • Maritieme Vacaturebank
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Authorities›Twist in “MT Højgaard vs E.ON” Case: Supreme Court Withdraws Ruling
Authorities

November 20, 2015 · about 10 years ago

Twist in “MT Højgaard vs E.ON” Case: Supreme Court Withdraws Ruling

The Supreme Court in London will withdraw the ruling in favour of MT Højgaard from 5 November, when it rejected an application from E.ON to allow an appeal against the ruling in an old dispute regarding the Robin Rigg offshore wind farm. MT Højgaard said the Supreme Court will further evaluate E.ON’

2 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

The Supreme Court in London will withdraw the ruling in favour of MT Højgaard from 5 November, when it rejected an application from E.ON to allow an appeal against the ruling in an old dispute regarding the Robin Rigg offshore wind farm.

MT Højgaard said the Supreme Court will further evaluate E.ON’s application for an appeal, which could mean that that the dispute is not finally settled, describing the withdrawal itself as unusual.

“The purpose and the effect of this expected withdrawal by the Supreme Court is not known at this time,” MT Højgaard said in a press release.

E.ON claims MT Højgaard is responsible for the problem with the grouted connections of the foundations at the Robin Rigg offshore wind farm and that MT Højgaard should pay damages, in particular the cost of rectifying the problem. MT Højgaard denied liability arguing that the Group had observed the applicable international standards as required by the client.

The company considered the Supreme Court’s ruling from 5 November as final, and considered the matter to be settled, thus recognising DKK 195 million as income under Special items. However, after the court’s decision to withdraw the ruling, MT Højgaard said: “Should this imply that the dispute is not finally settled, it will cause the Group to re-establish a provision and adjust its guidance for Special items to DKK 0 against the present guidance of an income of DKK 195 million. Besides this the financial guidance for 2015 is not affected.”

Image: E.ON

Reach the offshoreWIND.biz industry in one go!

offshoreWIND.biz is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

Filed under

Authorities

Daily offshore wind news in your mailbox.

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Gennaker Offshore Wind Farm Reaches Financial Close
  2. 2Half of Turbines at Dieppe–Le Tréport Offshore Wind Farm In Place
  3. 3Gondan Launches Østensjø Rederi's Ocean Energy Support Vessel
  4. 4New Boskalis Rock Installation Vessel Starts Work Offshore Poland

Daily offshore wind news in your mailbox.

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free