Offshore Wind
  • Fixed-Bottom
  • Floating Wind
  • Supply Chain
  • Contracts & Tenders
  • Grid Connection
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Wind logo

Your trusted source for global offshore wind news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fixed-Bottom
  • Floating Wind
  • Grid Connection
  • Power-to-X
  • Supply Chain
Network
  • Offshore Wind
  • Dredging Today
  • NavalToday
  • Offshore Energy
  • Maritieme Vacaturebank
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Authorities›Developer Submits ‘Plan B’ Application for Navitus Bay
Authorities

November 17, 2014 · about 12 years ago

Developer Submits ‘Plan B’ Application for Navitus Bay

Navitus Bay Development Limited has submitted an alternative proposal for fewer turbines that will be further from the Coast. The examining authority for the Navitus Bay Wind Park Application recently set out a number of written questions and requests for information. A question aimed at Navitus Bay

2 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

Navitus Bay Development Limited has submitted an alternative proposal for fewer turbines that will be further from the Coast.

The examining authority for the Navitus Bay Wind Park Application recently set out a number of written questions and requests for information. A question aimed at Navitus Bay Development Limited (the Applicant) asked whether it was possible that during the examination the Applicant will offer to reduce the number of turbines below the current range of 121-194 and/or remove those closest to terrestrial viewpoints.

In response, the Applicant has submitted plans for a reduced layout. This does not replace the original submission; however, in the event that the Secretary of State decides that the proposal does not strike the right balance between benefits and impacts, the second option which is referred to as the “mitigation option” reduces the number of turbines closet to the terrestrial viewpoints.

Key characteristics of the mitigation option

The mitigation option would result generating capacity of up to 630MW, a range of turbines between 76 x 8MW and 105 x 6MW, reduced turbine area from 153sq. km to 79sq. km and movement further south of the north west and north east boundaries of the turbine area.

It is claimed that the mitigation option would increase the separation of the turbine area from the coast by 4.5km from Durlston Head, 5.7km from Bournemouth, and 4.2km from the Needles.

In addition, the Applicant states that it would reduce the horizontal spread of the turbine area when seen from the coast by 26% from Durlston Head, 20% from Bournemouth, and 30% from the Needles.

[mappress mapid=”14802″]

Press release; Image: Navitus Bay

Reach the Offshore Wind industry in one go!

Offshore Wind is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Wind on:

Filed under

AuthoritiesBusiness & Finance

Daily Offshore Wind News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Trump Administration Seeks Remand of COP Approval for Offshore Wind Farm Now in Final Commissioning Stage
  2. 2Ofgem to Launch Record Tender as UK Regulator Seeks Owner of Hornsea 3 Offshore Transmission Assets
  3. 3French Engineering Company Acquires Irish Sea Contractors to Expand Offshore Wind and Cable Services
  4. 4Pacifico Energy Launches Survey Campaign for 1.8 GW Offshore Wind Projects in Vietnam

Daily Offshore Wind News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free